![]() The hidden advantage of a diverse team assembling for this kind of review, is that you silently generate support for your project – that can translate into increased budget, and reduced pressure to waste effort on trivial or non-critical projects. ![]() You can, for example, offer business leaders an imagined budget of a single dollar, and ask them to assign in pennies the amount they would spend on each course they are reviewing. Hint: There are some great exercises you can do here that would also help to generate buy-in across units in the modernization strategy. Is well made (meets the training & engagement needs), 3) needs a facelift, 4) is worth the expense and would benefit by modernization – like creation of a mobile compatible version. If your library of legacy content is substantial, you might even want to form a committee of instructional designers, eLearning professionals, subject matter experts, legal consultants, and business professionals to sort the stack and identify those courses that pass the filters and sort them to identify whether a course 1) is required, 2. You may also find that taking advantage of the moment to scan through hundreds or thousands of older courses helps give your team an opportunity to discover patterns of poor design, ineffective training methods or structural weaknesses in your legacy content offerings. Stale eLearning content is incredibly common, and it might be cheaper to simply dump the old content in favor of something with a new face. Passing your content through the above filters could save you a significant amount of time and money. Should you take advantage of the update to add support for mobile devices?.Should you leverage the conversion as an opportunity to unify the content with your newest brand standards and learning design strategy?.Would conversion of older content to video suffice?.How much budget (in time and resources) do you have to handle the update?.How important is updating this content to your overall learning strategy?.Does the content contain a lot of audio, video, animation, or custom complex interactions?.Is the content appearance dated? Does it look old?.There are a few important factors to consider in this update process Let’s start looking at the problem with some critical initial considerations.Ĭritical considerations before you start spending time and money on conversion It is often better to simply start afresh – and in the process you may well be able to produce a far superior product, in far less time. The half-life of many skills today is so short, that you must seriously consider whether or not the older training has much value at all. There are also some notable differences, including the pace at which training material decays. You could draw two conclusions from this parable 1.) That it is often better in the end to simply start over, or 2.) that there are sometimes core materials that can be preserved (the fabric pattern pieces) even if you are going to rip the material apart and start again.įor me, the process with recreating legacy eLearning content is similar. If this was the verdict, you would remove all of the sewn seams (your work) and start again. It was pretty common to hear rip and redo. Either you were told the next step, or you were told … rip and redo. The head seamstress would inspect each piece of construction before we moved on to the next piece. Long ago I did some work in a costume department of a stage theater company. One important anecdote rings in my mind as I consider this topic as a whole. In this article, I’ll describe the relevant issues and concerns related to modernizing a library of legacy content, make suggestions about ways to determine your best path forward, and include some detailed technical recommendations – should you choose to update your legacy content. It is important to evaluate the impact of this event on your organization, well in advance of the deadline. For many, however, there are a significant number of eLearning courses, job aids and performance support materials that were developed and delivered to learners using earlier versions of Adobe Captivate, which published to the Flash SWF format. It is commonly regarded as the ‘end’ of Flash. In December of 2020, Adobe will cease support for Adobe Flash – SWF format content. Implementing a process to migrate legacy Flash eLearning courses to HTML5
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |